
In recent years, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)—also known as glutamate carboxypeptidase 2—has been a topic of great interest for clinicians and patients alike. Compared with traditional imaging modalities such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging or conventional computed tomography (CT), PSMA PET (in conjunction with CT) offers a more precise and targeted diagnostic modality for patients with prostate cancer.
The underlying mechanism of PSMA is the overexpression of PSMA on the extracellular compartment and the upregulation of PSMA expression by anywhere from 100- to 1000-fold with the onset of prostate cancer.1 Studies have shown that the degree of PSMA expression correlates with tumor stage and grade, with the notable exception of neuroendocrine tumors. The underlying biochemistry of the PSMA receptor facilitates the process of creating synthetic agents to bind the receptor, consequently providing diagnostic and therapeutic potential.
Modern PSMA binding ligands are constructed with a urea molecular scaffold known as a PSMA pharmacophore, which has been the dominant molecular type for PSMA ligand synthesis since 2001. The first generation of PSMA binding ligands were monoclonal antibodies. They posed several limitations, including, but not limited to, slower target recognition and background clearance times.2 Comparatively, second-generation urea-based agents offer several advantages, including improved biological stability and resistance to extreme conditions such as temperature and pH.3 These characteristics have enabled the creation of a variety of PSMA-directed, urea-scaffold-based pharmacophores that bind to the PSMA receptor with great affinity, facilitating both diagnostic and therapeutic effects.