Yes, we are now starting to use it in the upfront setting. There was a randomized trial, the pro PSMA trial, I’m sure Dr. Calais can also speak to that as well that really did kind of a head-to-head comparison in the localized prostate cancer setting of conventional imaging versus PSMA imaging. And first of all, it showed that there was much better sensitivity and specificity at using PSMA, but the general conclusion of that study was that it could potentially, well, it should perhaps replace conventional imaging. I think there’s some debate that remains about should it necessarily replace, but I think in the upfront newly diagnosed setting, it can be very helpful in helping guide therapies. For instance, somebody who you would’ve perhaps thought needed surgery or radiation upfront who might have metastatic disease at this point, you can certainly spare them, maybe some of the morbidity of doing treatments if they happen to have widespread metastasis and get them onto appropriate systemic therapies.