
The Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO)1 is holding its semiannual meeting at the Omni Shoreham Hotel in Washington, DC, November 28-December 1, 2023. The goal of the meeting is to improve urologic cancer care by sharing data on the latest clinical trials and techniques for diagnosis and treatment. The meeting covers a broad range of urology topics, including prostate cancer, kidney cancer, and bladder cancer, as well as less commonly discussed topics like penile cancer. The event is typically attended by an extensive audience—practicing urologic oncologists, SUO urologic oncology fellows, research fellows, and other trainees—and it offers several presentation formats, including abstract and poster presentations, lectures, and panel discussions. There are also workshops for specific new technologies and treatment modalities. In this article, I will briefly highlight some of the most interesting and exciting topics due to be discussed at this year’s meeting.
An estimated 12.9% of the US male population will receive a prostate cancer diagnosis at some point in their lifetimes.2 That diagnosis can induce feelings of anxiety and, depending on the treatment modality, may have long-term effects such as erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence, which can significantly impact quality of life. Knowing the landscape of prostate cancer management today, the SUO meeting is an important opportunity to drive advancements in prostate cancer care and reduce the burden of the disease on men worldwide.
Definitive early detection and diagnosis is of utmost importance to reducing the morbidity of prostate cancer, but it is difficult to find the intersection between early diagnosis and over intervention. Identifying new technologies and working to overcome technical and economic considerations can help alleviate this challenge. For example, transperineal (TP) prostate biopsy has been applauded for its well-documented lower rates of postbiopsy infection when compared with transrectal prostate biopsy (<0.5% vs 3.6%).3 Yet TP prostate biopsy is considered economically unfavorable. Cost considerations, such as the need to purchase specialized equipment to perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound-guided biopsies, is one major hurdle to implementing TP prostate biopsy. Limited reimbursement rates is another. I look forward to the presentation from Parth K. Modi, MD, on the economics of TP prostate biopsy and how he proposes to overcome the current economic issues facing its widespread adoption.4