
A late-breaking abstract at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress 2023 shed light on the effects of erdafitinib versus intravesical chemotherapy in patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HR NMIBC) with select fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations who experienced disease recurrence after bacillus Calmette Guérin (BCG) treatment.
Current treatment options for patients with HR NMIBC who have recurrence after BCG treatment are limited, especially for those who are ineligible for or refuse radical cystectomy. In the phase 3 THOR study, erdafitinib—an oral selective pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor—demonstrated an overall survival benefit compared with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with FGFR alterations.
James W. Catto, MB, ChB, PhD, FRCS, of the University of Sheffield, and colleagues reported the first randomized data in patients with recurrent BCG-treated HR NMIBC with FGFR alterations from cohort 1 of the THOR-2 study. A total of 73 adult patients with papillary-only HR NMIBC (high-grade Ta/T1) who were ineligible or refused radical cystectomy were randomized (2:1) to either erdafitinib (6 mg orally; n=49) or investigator’s choice of intravesical chemotherapy (mitomycin C or gemcitabine; n=24).